Am Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 22:07, schrieb JG: > non-journalling fs) or do i have to live with it that encryption eats > all my cpu? Yes of course, the encryption process is slower than the disk access, so encryption will eat 100% cpu while transfering data from/to an encrypted disk device. Especially if you copy from one encrypted device to another, so the data also has to be decrypted first. Did you expect anything else? Greetings, Gunter -- *********** Powered by AudioScrobbler -> http://www.last.fm/ *********** 22:40 | Sirenia - On The Wane 22:34 | Sirenia - Sister Nightfall 22:28 | Sirenia - Meridian 22:20 | Tristania - Endogenisis *** PGP-Verschlüsselung bei eMails erwünscht :-) *** PGP: 0x1128F25F ***
Attachment:
pgp61N3o6hzqz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rt16
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/12] generic *_bit()
- Previous by thread: 100% cpu usage (kjournald, pdflush) with encrypted disks (dm-crypt)
- Next by thread: Re: 100% cpu usage (kjournald, pdflush) with encrypted disks (dm-crypt)
- Index(es):
 |