Re: + cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:11:08PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
 > >Did your pull fail for some reason? 
 > >
 > >		Dave
 > 
 > I got this answer from Andrew, maybe he also picked up the patch
 > from cpufreq list?:
 > ____________
 > This generates 100% rejects against the current cpufreq tree.

Ah, that's because I changed the indentation slightly when I merged it.

 > The patch needs a (!policy->cur) check for some cpufreq drivers, shall I 
 > resend
 > the whole patch with this one added or is the "ontop" patch I answered to 
 > [email protected] (Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4) enough?

The 'ontop' is enough probably (I'm having a 'heavy' email day, so I've not
got to it yet).

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux