On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:11:08PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> >Did your pull fail for some reason?
> >
> > Dave
>
> I got this answer from Andrew, maybe he also picked up the patch
> from cpufreq list?:
> ____________
> This generates 100% rejects against the current cpufreq tree.
Ah, that's because I changed the indentation slightly when I merged it.
> The patch needs a (!policy->cur) check for some cpufreq drivers, shall I
> resend
> the whole patch with this one added or is the "ontop" patch I answered to
> [email protected] (Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4) enough?
The 'ontop' is enough probably (I'm having a 'heavy' email day, so I've not
got to it yet).
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
