|| On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:12:17 -0200 || Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]> wrote: g> So, I think the main point is that free software and Linux has g> both to gain being together. And maybe saying no to GPLv3 may be a g> too disruptive move. GPLv3 is still a draft. Can't it be discussed g> a little among with Linus, some companies representants, and some g> guys from fsf? Yes, indeed discussing is what FSF has allocated an entire year for. While it is possible that this particular criticism was based on a misunderstanding, which may be an indicator of need for language improvement, all criticism should ideally be put into a comprehensive form and submitted through the gplv3.fsf.org/comments system. If Linus lacks the time to do it himself, maybe some people on this list could help gather his points as possible submissions for improvement? Regards, Georg -- Georg C. F. Greve <[email protected]> Free Software Foundation Europe (http://fsfeurope.org) Join the Fellowship and protect your freedom! (http://www.fsfe.org)
Attachment:
pgpa8LRFF76Cj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Thomas Horsten <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Filip Brcic <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Prev by Date: [OT] Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Next by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Next by thread: Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Index(es):
 |