On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:36:07AM -0800, Jeremy Higdon wrote: > Here's one that removes xcount. It seems to work too. > Should we set hwif->rqsize to 256, or are we pretty safe in > expecting that the default won't rise? The driver should be 255 is the safest for LBA28 devices because a small number incorrectly interpret 0 (meaning 256) as 0. And that can have unfortunate results - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- References:
- [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- From: Jeremy Higdon <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- From: Jeremy Higdon <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- From: Jeremy Higdon <[email protected]>
- [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- Prev by Date: Re: Right way to configure a driver? (sysfs, ioctl, proc, configfs,....)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Avoid moving tasks when a schedule can be made.
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Fix DMA timeouts with sgiioc4
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
- Index(es):
 |