Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:36:07AM -0800, Jeremy Higdon wrote:
> Here's one that removes xcount.  It seems to work too.
> Should we set hwif->rqsize to 256, or are we pretty safe in
> expecting that the default won't rise?  The driver should be

255 is the safest for LBA28 devices because a small number incorrectly
interpret 0 (meaning 256) as 0. And that can have unfortunate results
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
    • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
    • From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
    • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
    • From: Jeremy Higdon <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
    • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
    • From: Jeremy Higdon <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
    • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
    • From: Jeremy Higdon <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Right way to configure a driver? (sysfs, ioctl, proc, configfs,....)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Avoid moving tasks when a schedule can be made.
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Fix DMA timeouts with sgiioc4
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]