Re: [PATCH] timer tsc ensure we allow for initial tsc and tsc sync

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > >  	offset = hpet_readl(HPET_T0_CMP) - hpet_tick;
> > > -	if (unlikely(((offset - hpet_last) > hpet_tick) && (hpet_last != 0))) {
> > > +	if (unlikely(((offset - hpet_last) > hpet_tick) && (hpet_last != 0))
> > > +					&& detect_lost_ticks) {
> > 
> > Simple enough.  John, so you feel that this is 2.6.16 material?
> 
> Yep.  There's a signed off version somewhere in your inbox.

<looks>

Oh yeah.  Hate it when that happens.

> > Note that the time changes in -mm will blow this change away, so I'd be
> > needing a fresh version of this patch against next-mm, please.
> 
> Uh, not sure I followed that. Do mean you'd want a new set of the
> generic timefoday patches to apply ontop of this fix?

argh, spare me from that.

No, I'd like a new version of this patch which applies on top of the
generic-tod patches please.  Could do it myself, but you moved all the code
around and I can't find anything ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/