Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> just to make sure - is the trace below a safe use of sk_dst_lock too?  
> Here sk_dst_lock seems to be taken in real softirq context.

You're right this does look suspicious.  Let me take a closer look...
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage?
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage?
  - From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
  - From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/11] LED: Add IDE disk activity LED trigger
Next by Date: r8169 driver - no net connection and hang at shutdown
Previous by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
Next by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]