Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ray Bryant wrote:

On Friday 27 January 2006 16:50, Brian Twichell wrote:
<snip>

Hi,

We collected more granular performance data for the ppc64/hugepage case.

CPI decreased by 3% when shared pagetables were used.  Underlying this was
a 7% decrease in the overall TLB miss rate.  The TLB miss rate for
hugepages decreased 39%.  TLB miss rates are calculated per instruction
executed.


Interesting.

Do you know if Dave's patch supports sharing of pte's for 2 MB pages on X86_64?
I believe it does.  Dave, can you confirm ?

Was there a corresponding improvement in overall transaction throughput for the hugetlb, shared pte case? That is, did the 3% improvement in CPI translate to a measurable improvement in the overall OLTP benchmark score?
Yes.  My original post with performance data described a 3% improvement
in the ppc64/hugepage case.  This is a transaction throughput statement.

(I'm assuming your 25-50% improvement measurements, as mentioned in a previous note, was for small pages.)

That's correct.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux