Dont use num_processors as index to generate logical cpu# in x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andi

Please consider the following patch. Iam in process of developing ACPI based
cpu hotplug support. Using num_processors as index is not friendly to 
hotplug, so i turned it to use cpu_present_map instead. The code is 
also little bit more cleaner and easy to ready.

Cheers,
ashok

-- 
Cheers,
Ashok Raj
- Open Source Technology Center


Minor cleanup to lend better for physical CPU hotplug.
Earlier way of using num_processors as index doesnt
fit if CPUs come and go. This makes the code little bit better
to read, and helps physical hotplug use the same functions as boot.

Reserving CPU0 for BSP is too late to be done in smp_prepare_boot_cpu().
Since logical assignments from MADT is already done via
setup_arch()->acpi_boot_init()->parse lapic

Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
------------------------------------------------------
 arch/x86_64/kernel/mpparse.c |   19 ++++++++-----------
 arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c   |    6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm2/arch/x86_64/kernel/mpparse.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm2.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/mpparse.c
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm2/arch/x86_64/kernel/mpparse.c
@@ -106,11 +106,11 @@ static int __init mpf_checksum(unsigned 
 	return sum & 0xFF;
 }
 
-static void __init MP_processor_info (struct mpc_config_processor *m)
+static void __cpuinit MP_processor_info (struct mpc_config_processor *m)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	unsigned char ver;
-	static int found_bsp=0;
+	cpumask_t tmp_map;
 
 	if (!(m->mpc_cpuflag & CPU_ENABLED)) {
 		disabled_cpus++;
@@ -133,8 +133,10 @@ static void __init MP_processor_info (st
 		return;
 	}
 
-	cpu = num_processors++;
-	
+	num_processors++;
+	cpus_complement(tmp_map, cpu_present_map);
+	cpu = first_cpu(tmp_map);
+
 #if MAX_APICS < 255	
 	if ((int)m->mpc_apicid > MAX_APICS) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "Processor #%d INVALID. (Max ID: %d).\n",
@@ -160,12 +162,7 @@ static void __init MP_processor_info (st
  		 * entry is BSP, and so on.
  		 */
 		cpu = 0;
-
- 		bios_cpu_apicid[0] = m->mpc_apicid;
- 		x86_cpu_to_apicid[0] = m->mpc_apicid;
- 		found_bsp = 1;
- 	} else
-		cpu = num_processors - found_bsp;
+ 	}
 	bios_cpu_apicid[cpu] = m->mpc_apicid;
 	x86_cpu_to_apicid[cpu] = m->mpc_apicid;
 
@@ -691,7 +688,7 @@ void __init mp_register_lapic_address (
 }
 
 
-void __init mp_register_lapic (
+void __cpuinit mp_register_lapic (
 	u8			id, 
 	u8			enabled)
 {
Index: linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm2/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm2.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm2/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -704,6 +704,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 
 	check_ioapic();
 
+	/*
+	 * set this early, so we dont allocate cpu0
+	 * if MADT list doesnt list BSP first
+	 * mpparse.c/MP_processor_info() allocates logical cpu numbers.
+	 */
+	cpu_set(0, cpu_present_map);
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 	/*
 	 * Read APIC and some other early information from ACPI tables.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux