Re: [patch 0/6] -stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Chuck Wolber <[email protected]> writes:

> I don't know if there is a problem, but it goes against the concept of 
> "one-off" fixes that aren't maintained

If they have time for this then great, I can't see any drawbacks.
The early concept was just meant to limit the workload.

> (aka the purpose of the -stable 
> team). This slope eventually leads us to backporting -stable fixes from 
> other -stable releases etc etc.

As long as they can contribute their time it's a win.
Krzysztof Halasa
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux