Matthias Andree <[email protected]> wrote:
> with this open letter, I officially request that you stop your
> misrepresentations in cdrecord that claim Linux were noncompliant in a
> place where it is conforming to POSIX.
>
> I am not speaking on behalf of any other party here, this is purely my
> personal opinion that is supposed to make sure both sides play fair.
>
> <ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/AN-2.01.01a05>
> (dated 2006-01-29 20:20" states
I am sorry to see that you still insist in claiming things that are not in this
announcement.
You did inform me about this Linux "self non-compliance" and you are the only
person who did claim that there is a problem. I spend a lot of time in trying
to find a work around for this problem and I am in hope that I did find a
working solution.
Please stop claiming things I did never write!
I did never mention that this was a POSIX non-compliance, this is entirely from
your imagination. I rather mentioned that this is a problem caused by the fact
that Linux changed it's behavior in a way that breaks existing applications.
For this reason it is apropriate to call the code that deals with the problem
"a workaround".
Jörg
--
EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[email protected] (uni)
[email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
