On Mon, Jan 30, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> >>We can think about optimizing this to
> >> if (!sb->sprunes)
> >> wake_up(&sb->s_wait_prunes);
> >>
> >
> >
> >Hardly. This is only the case when two or more shrinkers are active in
> >parallel. If that was the case often, we would have seen this much more
> >frequent IMHO.
> But this avoids taking 2nd lock on fast path.
>
No, the fast path (more frequent) is s_prunes == 0.
sb->s_prunes--;
if (likely(!sb->s_prunes))
wake_up(&sb->s_wait_prunes);
This is only optimizing a rare case ... and unmounting isn't very time
critical.
Regards,
Jan
--
Jan Blunck [email protected]
SuSE LINUX AG - A Novell company
Maxfeldstr. 5 +49-911-74053-608
D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
