>> >DECLARE_MUTEX will go away. >> >> And be replaced by... DEFINE_SEMAPHORE? > >... or just go away entirely, depending if there are any users of it >left after all mutexes have been converted to DEFINE_MUTEX()... Does that imply that struct semaphore be removed too? You can't do that. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- References:
- [PATCH] 2.6.15: access permission filesystem 0.17
- From: Olaf Dietsche <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.15: access permission filesystem 0.17
- From: Rolf Eike Beer <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- From: Olaf Dietsche <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] 2.6.15: access permission filesystem 0.17
- Prev by Date: Re: insmod error
- Next by Date: [PATCH] make register_die_notifier() usable for modules
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc1-git4] accessfs: a permission managing filesystem
- Index(es):
 |