Re: memory leak in scsi_cmd_cache 2.6.15

On Saturday 28 January 2006 13:26, Jens Axboe wrote:
> It's not a bad data point, it just confirms that setting ->ordered_flush
> to 0 in the SATA drivers will fix the leak. So really, it's as expected.
> So far apparently nobody tried it, suggested it twice.

In case you still wanted the data point, I just set ordered_flush to 0 on my 
ata_piix and the slab leak disappeared.

Thanks,
Chase
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: memory leak in scsi_cmd_cache 2.6.15
  - From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

References:
- memory leak in scsi_cmd_cache 2.6.15
  - From: Ariel <[email protected]>
- Re: memory leak in scsi_cmd_cache 2.6.15
  - From: Nix <[email protected]>
- Re: memory leak in scsi_cmd_cache 2.6.15
  - From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: RCU latency regression in 2.6.16-rc1
Next by Date: Re: RCU latency regression in 2.6.16-rc1
Previous by thread: Re: memory leak in scsi_cmd_cache 2.6.15
Next by thread: Re: memory leak in scsi_cmd_cache 2.6.15
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]