Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > (And it forgot to initialise the atomic_t) > > I declared it static. Isn't that sufficient ? ATOMIC_INIT(0); > > (And has a couple of suspicious-looking module exports. We don't support > > CONFIG_PROC_FS=m). > > Where ? +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_nr_files); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_max_files); Why are these needed? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- References:
- [patch 0/2] RCU: fix various latency/oom issues
- From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] rcu batch tuning
- From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
- [patch 0/2] RCU: fix various latency/oom issues
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ide-tape: attempt to handle copy_*_user() failures [take two]
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] net/core/flow.c CONFIG_SMP Fix in flow_cache_flush(void)
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/2] fix file counting
- Index(es):
 |