Re: [patch 3/4] net: Percpufy frequently used variables -- proto.sockets_allocated

[Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>]

Andrew Morton a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote:
> > Ravikiran G Thirumalai a écrit :
> > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:16:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org> wrote:
> > > > > which can be assumed as not frequent.  
> > > > > At sk_stream_mem_schedule(), read_sockets_allocated() is invoked only 
> > > > > certain conditions, under memory pressure -- on a large CPU count machine, 
> > > > > you'd have large memory, and I don't think read_sockets_allocated would get 
> > > > > called often.  It did not atleast on our 8cpu/16G box.  So this should be OK 
> > > > > I think.
> > > > That being said, the percpu_counters aren't a terribly successful concept
> > > > and probably do need a revisit due to the high inaccuracy at high CPU
> > > > counts.  It might be better to do some generic version of vm_acct_memory()
> > > > instead.
> > > AFAICS vm_acct_memory is no better.  The deviation on large cpu counts is the 
> > > same as percpu_counters -- (NR_CPUS * NR_CPUS * 2) ...
> > Ah... yes you are right, I read min(16, NR_CPUS*2)
>
> So did I ;)
>
> > I wonder if it is not a typo... I mean, I understand the more cpus you have, 
> > the less updates on central atomic_t is desirable, but a quadratic offset 
> > seems too much...
>
> I'm not sure whether it was a mistake or if I intended it and didn't do the
> sums on accuracy :(
>
> An advantage of retaining a spinlock in percpu_counter is that if accuracy
> is needed at a low rate (say, /proc reading) we can take the lock and then
> go spill each CPU's local count into the main one.  It would need to be a
> very low rate though.   Or we make the cpu-local counters atomic too.

We might use atomic_long_t only (and no spinlocks)
Something like this ?

struct percpu_counter {
	atomic_long_t count;
	atomic_long_t *counters;
};

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
void percpu_counter_mod(struct percpu_counter *fbc, long amount)
{
	long old, new;
	atomic_long_t *pcount;

	pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, get_cpu());
start:
	old = atomic_long_read(pcount);
	new = old + amount;
	if (new >= FBC_BATCH || new <= -FBC_BATCH) {
		if (unlikely(atomic_long_cmpxchg(pcount, old, 0) != old))
			goto start;
		atomic_long_add(new, &fbc->count);
	} else
		atomic_long_add(amount, pcount);

	put_cpu();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_mod);

long percpu_counter_read_accurate(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
	long res = 0;
	int cpu;
	atomic_long_t *pcount;

	for_each_cpu(cpu) {
		pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
		/* dont dirty cache line if not necessary */
		if (atomic_long_read(pcount))
			res += atomic_long_xchg(pcount, 0);
	}
	return res;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_read_accurate);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */