I found a patch called: slab-leak-detector.patch and applied it (manually
since it's for a slightly older kernel).
Here are the results: (after leaking about 1MB)
c03741ba <__scsi_get_command+0x29/0x73>
Is the leaker with 294 of them, vs 4 of:
c03743fd <scsi_setup_command_freelist+0xb0/0x101>
and 21:
fffffffe <0xfffffffe>
I'm not sure how helpful that result is though, since I guess we already
knew it was scsi, and from the other email, that's it's also some
interaction with md.
-Ariel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
