Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> If I'd want to contribute code to the kernel, I'd have to comply with 
> the license of the kernel, which is v2 of the GPL. If I would actually 
> prefer my code to be licensed under v3 or higher, I'd have to specify 
> that my code is only licensed under v2 for the kernel to humour Linus 
> Torvalds and respect the license of the kernel, but in all other ways 
> the code is used, I only grant a license to copy under the conditions of 
> the GPL v3 or higher. I don't see why that would affect the distribution 
> of the kernel at all.

"GPLv2 only for the kernel" is a different license than "GPLv2" and is
incompatible with GPLv2.

  OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux