On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 10:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > trace_special_pid(sch.task->pid, sch.task->prio, p->prio);
> > - if (sch.task && (sch.task->prio >= p->prio))
> > + if (sch.task && ((sch.task->prio <= p->prio) || !rt_task(p)))
> > sch.task = NULL;
>
> this second condition i'd not change: it just expresses the rare case
> where a higher-prio task hits the CPU that we somehow did not start to
> trace. In that case we just zap the current trace.
>
OK, I think I understand that part now too. There wasn't any comments
about what it was doing so I wasn't sure if that was the right move.
But looking at it further, I believe you are right.
Thanks,
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
