Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
Could you add this patch to your set ?
This was needed to boot my x86 machine without HIGHMEM.
Sorry, I sent a wrong patch..
This is correct one.
I can add it although I would like to know more about the problem. I tried
booting with and without CONFIG_HIGHMEM both stock kernels and with
anti-frag and they all boot fine. What causes your machine to die? Does it
occur with stock -mm or just with anti-frag?
Sorry, it looks there is no problem with your newest set :(
This was problem of my tree...
Sigh, I should be more carefull.
my note is attached.
Sorry,
-- Kame
== Note ==
I replaced si_meminfo() like following
==
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
val->totalhigh = nr_total_zonetype_pages(ZONE_HIGHMEM);
val->freehigh = nr_free_zonetype_pages(ZONE_HIGHMEM);
#else
==
If ZONE_HIGHMEM has no pages, val->totalhigh is 0 and mempool for bounce buffer
is not initialized.
But, now
==
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
val->totalhigh = totalhigh_pages;
val->freehigh = nr_free_highpages();
#else
==
totalhigh_pages is defined by highstart_pfn and highend_pfn.
By Zone_EasyRclm, totalhigh_pages is not affected.
mempool for bounce buffer is properly initialized....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
