Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



El Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:37:28 -0800,
"David Schwartz" <[email protected]> escribió:

> is offered for inclusion. He cannot, however, change the license on any code
> he did not write. He cannot even grant a license to any code he did not

And he's not doing it, the COPYING file applies for all the code which 
doesn't specifies its own license.


Notice that COPYING has this: "Also note that the only valid version of
the GPL as far as the kernel  is concerned is _this_ particular version
of the license (ie v2, not  v2.2 or v3.x or whatever),
unless explicitly otherwise stated."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

(IOW, people should care about their own code, but obviously people
usually licenses their code under the same license the project uses,
except some drivers that use a dual-license scheme etc)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux