Re: [patch 3/9] mempool - Make mempools NUMA aware

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Matthew Dobson wrote:

> Not all requests for memory from a specific node are performance
> enhancements, some are for correctness.  With large machines, especially as

alloc_pages_node and friends do not guarantee allocation on that specific 
node. That argument for "correctness" is bogus.

> > You do not need this.... 
> I do not agree...

There is no way that you would need this patch.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 3/9] mempool - Make mempools NUMA aware
    • From: Matthew Dobson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 3/9] mempool - Make mempools NUMA aware
    • From: Matthew Dobson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 3/9] mempool - Make mempools NUMA aware
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 3/9] mempool - Make mempools NUMA aware
    • From: Matthew Dobson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: USB host pci-quirks
• Next by Date: Re: [ 00/23] [Suspend2] Freezer Upgrade Patches
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 3/9] mempool - Make mempools NUMA aware
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 3/9] mempool - Make mempools NUMA aware
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]