On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > (removing Jens and Lee, as previous posts made that quite clear) > > >> I'm getting a grin: > >> > >> 15:46 takeshi:../drivers/ide > find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep SG_IO > >> (no results) > >> > >> Looks like it's already non-redundant :) > > > >everything in drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c is duplicate code and I am sure I > >would find more if I take some time.... > > In what linux kernel version have you found that file? > In taking a look at http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/lxr/ ... That file exists in versions 2.6.10 through 2.6.14. It's gone from 2.6.15 and onward, however. No comment as to the validity of its contents to the argument at hand. :-) > > Jan Engelhardt > -- - Vadim Lobanov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
- From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
- Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
- From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
- From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
- Prev by Date: Re: pthread_mutex_unlock (was Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow)
- Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/posix-timers.c: remove do_posix_clock_notimer_create()
- Previous by thread: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
- Next by thread: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
- Index(es):