Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

>
> (removing Jens and Lee, as previous posts made that quite clear)
>
> >> I'm getting a grin:
> >>
> >> 15:46 takeshi:../drivers/ide > find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep SG_IO
> >> (no results)
> >>
> >> Looks like it's already non-redundant :)
> >
> >everything in drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c  is duplicate code and I am sure I
> >would find more if I take some time....
>
> In what linux kernel version have you found that file?
>

In taking a look at http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/lxr/ ...
That file exists in versions 2.6.10 through 2.6.14. It's gone from
2.6.15 and onward, however.
No comment as to the validity of its contents to the argument at hand.
:-)

>
> Jan Engelhardt
> --

- Vadim Lobanov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
    • From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
    • From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
  • Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
    • From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
  • Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
    • From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
  • Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
    • From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
  • Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
    • From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
    • From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
    • From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: pthread_mutex_unlock (was Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow)
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/posix-timers.c: remove do_posix_clock_notimer_create()
• Previous by thread: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
• Next by thread: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]