Re: [PATCH 1/6] {set,clear,test}_bit() related cleanup

Pavel wrote:
> cpu_set sounds *very* ambiguous. We have thing called cpusets,

Hmmm ... you're right.  I've worked for quite some time on both
of these, and hadn't noticed this similarity before.

Oh well.  Such is the nature of naming things.  Sometimes nice
names resemble other nice names in unexpected ways.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/6] RFC: use include/asm-generic/bitops.h
  - From: [email protected] (Akinobu Mita)
- [PATCH 1/6] {set,clear,test}_bit() related cleanup
  - From: [email protected] (Akinobu Mita)
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] {set,clear,test}_bit() related cleanup
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: pthread_mutex_unlock (was Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow)
Next by Date: Re: RCU latency regression in 2.6.16-rc1
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/6] {set,clear,test}_bit() related cleanup
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/6] use non atomic operations for minix_*_bit() and ext2_*_bit()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]