Re: pthread_mutex_unlock (was Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow)

[Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>]

On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 16:49 -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> Basic "fairness" isn't the issue. Fairness is concerned with which of 
> *multiple waiting threads* gets the mutex, and that is certainly 
> irrelevant here. The issue is that the releasing thread should not be
> a candidate.
> 

You seem to be making 2 controversial assertions:

1. pthread_mutex_unlock must cause an immediate reschedule if other
threads are blocked on the mutex, and 
2. if the unlocking thread immediately tries to relock the mutex,
another thread must get it first

I disagree with #1, which makes #2 irrelevant.  It would lead to
obviously incorrect behavior, pthread_mutex_unlock would no longer be an
RT safe operation for example.

Also consider a SCHED_FIFO policy - static priorities and the scheduler
always runs the highest priority runnable thread - under your
interpretation of POSIX a high priority thread unlocking a mutex would
require the scheduler to run a lower priority thread which violates
SCHED_FIFO semantics.

Lee



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/