Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables

--On Wednesday, January 25, 2006 16:48:58 -0600 Ray Bryant
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Empirically, at least on Opteron, it looks like the first page of pte's
> is  never shared, even if the alignment of the mapped region is correct
> (i. e. a  2MB boundary for X86_64).    Is that what you expected?

If the region is aligned it should be shared.  I'll investigate.

Thanks,
Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables
    • From: "Ray Bryant" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables
    • From: "Ray Bryant" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables
    • From: Dave McCracken <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables
    • From: "Ray Bryant" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables
    • From: Dave McCracken <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables
    • From: "Ray Bryant" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] make it easy to test new kernels
• Next by Date: Re: [openib-general] Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]