On Tuesday 24 January 2006 18:06, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> Thanks for identifying the issues and sendint these patches Thomas.
>
> Patch 1 looks clean. New lines seem to contain spaces instead of tabs.
> The same issue is there in patch 2 as well. Can you resent it with
> indentation fixed.
>
> Patch 2 I am concenred with following hunk.
>
> @@ -161,16 +158,17 @@
> cpu_max_freq[cpu] = policy->max;
> dprintk("limit event for cpu %u: %u - %u kHz, currently
> %u kHz, last set to %u kHz\n", cpu, cpu_min_freq[cpu],
> cpu_max_freq[cpu], cpu_cur_freq[cpu], cpu_set_freq[cpu]);
> if (policy->max < cpu_set_freq[cpu]) {
> - __cpufreq_driver_target(¤t_policy[cpu],
> policy->max,
> - CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
> + if (!__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->max,
> + CPUFREQ_RELATION_H))
> + cpu_cur_freq[cpu] = policy->max;
>
> Should this me cpu_cur_freq[cpu] = policy->cur instead. As the max
> setting may not be supported by the driver, it might have set some
> closer available freq
>
> Same comment for below two driver target calls as well.
Ok, I all (cpu_max/min/cur_freq) assigned it after setting, this should be OK?
Seems as if I had some wrong indentation offset set and had not checked
the patch output itself, sorry about that.
Tell me if you still see any problems ...
Author: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]>
userspace governor need not to hold it's own cpufreq_policy,
better make use of the global core policy.
Also fixes a bug in case of frequency changes via _PPC.
Old min/max values have wrongly been passed to __cpufreq_driver_target()
(kind of buffered) and when max freq was available again, only the old
max(normally lowest freq) was still active.
cpufreq_userspace.c | 52
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.15/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
+++ linux-2.6.15/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ static unsigned int cpu_min_freq[NR_CPUS
static unsigned int cpu_cur_freq[NR_CPUS]; /* current CPU freq */
static unsigned int cpu_set_freq[NR_CPUS]; /* CPU freq desired by userspace
*/
static unsigned int cpu_is_managed[NR_CPUS];
-static struct cpufreq_policy current_policy[NR_CPUS];
static DECLARE_MUTEX (userspace_sem);
@@ -64,22 +63,22 @@ static struct notifier_block userspace_c
*
* Sets the CPU frequency to freq.
*/
-static int cpufreq_set(unsigned int freq, unsigned int cpu)
+static int cpufreq_set(unsigned int freq, struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
int ret = -EINVAL;
- dprintk("cpufreq_set for cpu %u, freq %u kHz\n", cpu, freq);
+ dprintk("cpufreq_set for cpu %u, freq %u kHz\n", policy->cpu, freq);
down(&userspace_sem);
- if (!cpu_is_managed[cpu])
+ if (!cpu_is_managed[policy->cpu])
goto err;
- cpu_set_freq[cpu] = freq;
+ cpu_set_freq[policy->cpu] = freq;
- if (freq < cpu_min_freq[cpu])
- freq = cpu_min_freq[cpu];
- if (freq > cpu_max_freq[cpu])
- freq = cpu_max_freq[cpu];
+ if (freq < cpu_min_freq[policy->cpu])
+ freq = cpu_min_freq[policy->cpu];
+ if (freq > cpu_max_freq[policy->cpu])
+ freq = cpu_max_freq[policy->cpu];
/*
* We're safe from concurrent calls to ->target() here
@@ -88,8 +87,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set(unsigned int freq
* A: cpufreq_set (lock userspace_sem) -> cpufreq_driver_target(lock
policy->lock)
* B: cpufreq_set_policy(lock policy->lock) -> __cpufreq_governor ->
cpufreq_governor_userspace (lock userspace_sem)
*/
- ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(¤t_policy[cpu], freq,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
+ ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
err:
up(&userspace_sem);
@@ -113,7 +111,7 @@ store_speed (struct cpufreq_policy *poli
if (ret != 1)
return -EINVAL;
- cpufreq_set(freq, policy->cpu);
+ cpufreq_set(freq, policy);
return count;
}
@@ -141,7 +139,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_userspace(st
cpu_cur_freq[cpu] = policy->cur;
cpu_set_freq[cpu] = policy->cur;
sysfs_create_file (&policy->kobj, &freq_attr_scaling_setspeed.attr);
- memcpy (¤t_policy[cpu], policy, sizeof(struct cpufreq_policy));
dprintk("managing cpu %u started (%u - %u kHz, currently %u kHz)\n", cpu,
cpu_min_freq[cpu], cpu_max_freq[cpu], cpu_cur_freq[cpu]);
up(&userspace_sem);
break;
@@ -157,20 +154,25 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_userspace(st
break;
case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
down(&userspace_sem);
- cpu_min_freq[cpu] = policy->min;
- cpu_max_freq[cpu] = policy->max;
- dprintk("limit event for cpu %u: %u - %u kHz, currently %u kHz, last set to
%u kHz\n", cpu, cpu_min_freq[cpu], cpu_max_freq[cpu], cpu_cur_freq[cpu],
cpu_set_freq[cpu]);
+ dprintk("limit event for cpu %u: %u - %u kHz,"
+ "currently %u kHz, last set to %u kHz\n",
+ cpu, policy->min, policy->max,
+ cpu_cur_freq[cpu], cpu_set_freq[cpu]);
if (policy->max < cpu_set_freq[cpu]) {
- __cpufreq_driver_target(¤t_policy[cpu], policy->max,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
- } else if (policy->min > cpu_set_freq[cpu]) {
- __cpufreq_driver_target(¤t_policy[cpu], policy->min,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
- } else {
- __cpufreq_driver_target(¤t_policy[cpu], cpu_set_freq[cpu],
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
+ __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->max,
+ CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+ }
+ else if (policy->min > cpu_set_freq[cpu]) {
+ __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->min,
+ CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
+ }
+ else {
+ __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, cpu_set_freq[cpu],
+ CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
}
- memcpy (¤t_policy[cpu], policy, sizeof(struct cpufreq_policy));
+ cpu_min_freq[cpu] = policy->min;
+ cpu_max_freq[cpu] = policy->max;
+ cpu_cur_freq[cpu] = policy->cur;
up(&userspace_sem);
break;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
