Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module

* Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> [2006-01-24 18:08]:
> > More interesting question: is pis^H^H^Hsysfs interaction in there safe for
> > modular code?
> 
> The core should be safe, at least I was trying to make it this way, so
> if you see something wrong - shout. Locking is another question
> though...

So do you want an updated patch using _GPL to export the symbols or to
change CONFIG_INPUT to boolean?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
    • From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
    • From: Martin Michlmayr <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
    • From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
• Next by Date: Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]