Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module

* Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> [2006-01-24 18:08]:
> > More interesting question: is pis^H^H^Hsysfs interaction in there safe for
> > modular code?
> 
> The core should be safe, at least I was trying to make it this way, so
> if you see something wrong - shout. Locking is another question
> though...

So do you want an updated patch using _GPL to export the symbols or to
change CONFIG_INPUT to boolean?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
  - From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
  - From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
Next by Date: Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Export symbols so CONFIG_INPUT works as a module
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]