Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 24 January 2006 01:51, Dave McCracken wrote:
>  Most of the large OLTP applications use fixed address
> mapping for their large shared regions.

Really? That sounds like a quite bad idea because it can easily break
if something changes in the way virtual memory is laid out (which
has happened - e.g. movement to 4level page tables on x86-64 and now
randomized mmaps) 

I don't think we should encourage such unportable behaviour.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux