On Monday 23 January 2006 18:39, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 January 2006 01:16, Ray Bryant wrote:
> > On Monday 23 January 2006 17:58, Ray Bryant wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> > > ... And what kind of alignment constraints do we end up
> > > under in order to make the sharing happen? (My guess would be that
> > > there aren't any such constraints (well, page alignment.. :-) if we
> > > are just sharing pte's.)
> >
> > Oh, obviously that is not right as you have to share full pte pages. So
> > on x86_64 I'm guessing one needs 2MB alignment in order to get the
> > sharing to kick in, since a pte page maps 512 pages of 4 KB each.
>
> The new randomized mmaps will likely actively sabotate such alignment. I
> just added them for x86-64.
>
> -Andi
Hmmm, does that mean there is a fundamental conflict between the desire to
share pte's and getting good cache coloring behavior?
Isn't it the case that if the region is large enough (say >> 2MB), that
randomized mmaps will just cause the first partial page of pte's to not be
shareable, and as soon as we have a full pte page mapped into the file that
the full pte pages will be shareable, etc, until the last (partial) pte page
is not shareable?
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Ray Bryant
AMD Performance Labs Austin, Tx
512-602-0038 (o) 512-507-7807 (c)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
