Re: [PATCH 6/9] device-mapper snapshot: barriers not supported

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2006-01-22T21:41:11, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Alasdair G Kergon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > The snapshot and origin targets are incapable of handling barriers and 
> > >  need to indicate this.
> > > 
> > > ...
> > >   
> > >  +	if (unlikely(bio_barrier(bio)))
> > >  +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > >  +
> > 
> > And what was happening if people _were_ sending such BIOs down?  Did it all
> > appear to work correctly?  If so, will this change cause
> > currently-apparently-working setups to stop working?
> 
> Filesystems basically disable using barriers on a device which doesn't
> support them, which is indicated by -EOPNOTSUPP. Barriers are allowed to
> fail in such fashion.
> 
> Now the interesting question is what happens when barriers are suddenly
> verboten on a stack which used to support them - because the new mapping
> doesn't support it _anymore_. Hrm. _Should_ work, but probably not
> tested much ;-)
> 

I don't understand that, sorry.

My concern is: has the above change any potential to cause
currently-working setups to stop working?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux