Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach

On Jan 21, 2006, at 4:05 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:46:00PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:

3. no ALSA drivers for the same hardware

[...]

SOUND_AU1550_AC97

The Au1550 should have an ALSA driver.  It was done
some time ago.  Perhaps we just didn't submit it to the
proper maintainer.  I'll track that down.

	-- Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: "Jordan Crouse" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Remove useless KDB vector
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]