[PATCH] powerpc: Fix sigmask handling in sys_sigsuspend.

From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>

Better save the sigmask instead of throwing it away so it can be restored.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
---

Completely untested. Just noticed this when adding TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
support for s390.

 arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c
index 3747ab0..c6d0595 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c
@@ -254,11 +254,9 @@ int do_signal(sigset_t *oldset, struct p
  */
 long sys_sigsuspend(old_sigset_t mask)
 {
-	sigset_t saveset;
-
 	mask &= _BLOCKABLE;
 	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-	saveset = current->blocked;
+	current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;
 	siginitset(&current->blocked, mask);
 	recalc_sigpending();
 	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 4/4] s390: Add missing memory constraint to stcrw().
• Next by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 4/4] s390: Add missing memory constraint to stcrw().
• Next by thread: Possible libata/sata/Asus problem (was Re: Need to upgrade to latest stable mdadm version?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]