Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: add kernel-doc for one function

hoi :)

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:19:26PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> That is the responsibility of the subsystem maintainer - as you have
> become now.
> At least in the normal case Andrew suck in the git trees and leave it to
> the git tree owners to push to Linus.

well, I tried both pushing to Linus and to Andrew, and the route via
Andrew worked better up to now ;-)

But I'd be happy to get my GIT tree accepted by Linus.
I'll just try again from time to time.

-- 
Martin Waitz

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] mm/slab: add kernel-doc for one function
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: add kernel-doc for one function
    • From: Martin Waitz <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: add kernel-doc for one function
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: SMP+nosmp=hang [was: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-mm2]
• Next by Date: [PATCH] ide-tape: attempt to handle copy_*_user() failures [take two]
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: add kernel-doc for one function
• Next by thread: soft update vs journaling?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]