Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach

>> Ah, so http://alphagate.hopto.org/quad_dsp/ which I had created
>> is The Right Thing?
>
>This will work for your card, but not for emu10k1.

Does emu10k1 provide no adsp, how does it work?


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: Jaroslav Kysela <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: Peter Zubaj <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
• Next by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Previous by thread: Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Next by thread: Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]