On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:33:26 +0100 (CET), Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looks like a bug?
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/usb-uhci.c Fri Jan 20 09:27:50 2006
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/usb-uhci.c Fri Jan 20 09:28:05 2006
> @@ -2505,7 +2505,7 @@
> ((urb_priv_t*)urb->hcpriv)->flags=0;
> }
>
> - if ((urb->status != -ECONNABORTED) && (urb->status != ECONNRESET) &&
> + if ((urb->status != -ECONNABORTED) && (urb->status != -ECONNRESET) &&
> (urb->status != -ENOENT)) {
This is not what the author intended, obviously. But I am not quite sure
what happens because of it. Seems like we unlink some things which are
about to return anyway... and then return -104 instead of -84. This
may be relatively harmless. At worst, the driver resubmits and gets
its -84 that way.
I vote to apply this and see what happens. We are early in 2.4.33 cycle,
so it should be safe.
-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
