Ingo Oeser <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, head, list) {
> > > + list_del(&this->list);
> > > + kmem_cache_free(robust_futex_cachep, this);
> > > + }
> >
> > If we're throwing away the entire contents of the list, there's no need to
> > detach items as we go.
>
> Couldn't even detach the list elements first by
>
> list_splice_init(&mapping->robust_head->robust_list, head);
>
> and free the list from "head" after releasing the mutex?
> This would reduce lock contention, no?
Yes, it would reduce lock contention nicely.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]