Michael Loftis wrote:
To more fully respond though....
Weeks is fine, and better than never. And there may be cases in which
the decision has to be made to 'abandon' a particular stable release in
favor of a newer version because of the difficulty or inability to
backport fixes.
I think that it's fine to push the maintenance effort away from the
mainline developers, probably even desireable, but then the
bugfixing/etc tends to happen in a disparate manner, off on lots of
forks at different places without them making their way back to some
central place.
Please be more specific or stop posting. No one is going to bother
answering you with any useful answer unless you are more specific.
From the general trend of the thread so far, it seems like a fairly
pointless request to me.
All well known distros had absolutely no problem with devfs -> udevd
transition, so why are you having problems?
If you stop spending time posting, you might actually have time to fix
your problems.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
