Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>]

Michael Loftis wrote:
> To more fully respond though....
>
> Weeks is fine, and better than never.  And there may be cases in which 
> the decision has to be made to 'abandon' a particular stable release in 
> favor of a newer version because of the difficulty or inability to 
> backport fixes.
> I think that it's fine to push the maintenance effort away from the 
> mainline developers, probably even desireable, but then the 
> bugfixing/etc tends to happen in a disparate manner, off on lots of 
> forks at different places without them making their way back to some 
> central place.
Please be more specific or stop posting. No one is going to bother 
answering you with any useful answer unless you are more specific.
From the general trend of the thread so far, it seems like a fairly 
pointless request to me.
All well known distros had absolutely no problem with devfs -> udevd 
transition, so why are you having problems?
If you stop spending time posting, you might actually have time to fix 
your problems.
James



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/