On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:21:40 MST, Michael Loftis said: > And that seems where we're going with this conversation. A fork/forks at > various versions to maintain bugfixes and support updates that's (more?) > open to submitters writing patches. Maintained by a separate group or > party, but with the 'blessing' from mainline to do so. A place for those > sorts of efforts to be focused, without necessarily involving the primary > developers. Congrats. You just re-invented bugzilla.redhat.com.
Attachment:
pgphDerLnSV3H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Development tree, PLEASE?
- From: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- From: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- From: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- From: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- From: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>
- Development tree, PLEASE?
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rt6: network driver disabled interrupts: skge_xmit_frame
- Next by Date: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Previous by thread: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Next by thread: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Index(es):
![]() |