Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:11:45PM -0000, Andy Chittenden wrote:
> > > > DMA free:20kB min:24kB low:28kB high:36kB active:0kB inactive:0kB
> > > > present:12740kB pages_scanned:4 all_unreclaimable? yes
> > >
> > > Note we only scanned 4 pages before we gave up.
> > > Larry Woodman came up with this patch below that clears all_unreclaimable
> > > when in two places where we've made progress at freeing up some pages
> > > which has helped oom situations for some of our users.
> >
> > That won't help - there are exactly zero pages on ZONE_DMA's LRU.
> >
> > The problem appears to be that all of the DMA zone has been gobbled up by
> > the BIO layer. It seems quite inappropriate that a modern 64-bit machine
> > is allocating tons of disk I/O pages from the teeny ZONE_DMA. I'm
> > suspecting that someone has gone and set a queue's ->bounce_gfp to the wrong
> > thing.
> >
> > Jens, would you have time to investigate please?
>
> Certainly, I'll get this tested and fixed this afternoon.
Wow ;)
You may find it's an x86_64 glitch - setting max_[low_]pfn wrong down in
the bowels of the arch mm init code, something like that.
I thought it might have been a regression which came in when we added
ZONE_DMA32 but the RH reporter is based on 2.6.14-<redhat stuff>, and he
didn't have ZONE_DMA32.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
