Re: [patch] sg: simplify page_count manipulations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:59:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > -	/* N.B. correction _not_ applied to base page of each allocation */
> > > -	for (k = 0; k < rsv_schp->k_use_sg; ++k, ++sg) {
> > > -		for (m = PAGE_SIZE; m < sg->length; m += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > > -			page = sg->page;
> > > -			if (startFinish)
> > > -				get_page(page);
> > > -			else {
> > > -				if (page_count(page) > 0)
> > > -					__put_page(page);
> > > -			}
> > > -		}
> > > -	}
> > > -}
> > 
> > What on earth is the above trying to do?  The inner loop is a rather
> > complex way of doing atomic_add(&page->count, sg->length/PAGE_SIZE).  One
> > suspects there's a missing "[m]" in there.
> > 
> 
> It does this on the first mmap of the device, in the hope that subsequent
> nopage, unmaps would not free the constituent pages in the scatterlist.
> 

But it's doing it wrongly, isn't it?  Or am I completely nuts?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux