On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 13:31 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Ok this is one piece of the puzzle. At your lowest level your hardware > does not have QP's but it does have something similar to isolate a userspace > process correct? Right. We implement almost none of the IB protocols in hardware. <b - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>
- Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>
- Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [openib-general] Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- From: Sean Hefty <mshefty@ichips.intel.com>
- Re: [openib-general] Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>
- Re: [openib-general] Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- Prev by Date: Re: [openib-general] Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- Next by Date: [PATCH 2/2] GFP_ZONETYPES calculate from GFP_ZONEMASK
- Previous by thread: Re: [openib-general] Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- Next by thread: Re: [openib-general] Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- Index(es):
![]() |