Re: [patch 5/6] mm: simplify vmscan vs release refcounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> The VM has an interesting race where a page refcount can drop to zero, but
> it is still on the LRU lists for a short time. This was solved by testing
> a 0->1 refcount transition when picking up pages from the LRU, and dropping
> the refcount in that case.

Heh. Now you keep the count offset, but you also end up removing all the 
comments about it (still) being -1 for free. 

And your changelog talks about "atomic_inc_not_zero()" even though the 
code actually does

	atomic_add_unless(&page->_count, 1, -1);

which makes it pretty confusing ;)

I also think it's wrong - you've changed put_page_testzero() to use 
"atomic_dec_and_test()", even though the count is based on -1.

So this patch _only_ works together with the next one, and is invalid in 
many ways on its own. You should re-split the de-skew part correctly..

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux