Benchmark comparison between -mm+NoOOM tree and with the new zones
I know you had also previously posted a very simplified version of your real
fragmentation avoidance patches. I was curious if you could repost those with
the other benchmarks for a 3 way comparison. The simplified version got rid of
a lot of the complexity people were complaining about and in my mind still seems
like preferable direction.
Zone based approaches are runtime inflexible and require boot time tuning by the
sysadmin. There are lots of workloads that "reasonable" defaults for a zone
based approach would cause the system to regress terribly.
-Joel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
