Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach

On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 18:46 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 3. no ALSA drivers for the same hardware
> 
> SOUND_SB 

ALSA certainly does support "100% Sound Blaster compatibles (SB16/32/64,
ESS, Jazz16)", it would be a joke if it didn't...

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch 1/1] selinux: fix and cleanup mprotect checks
• Next by Date: Re: scsi cmd slab leak? (Was Re: [ck] Anyone been having OOM killer problems lately?)
• Previous by thread: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]