This patch changes the code from:
preempt_disable();
for (;;) {
...
preempt_disable();
}
to:
for (;;) {
preempt_disable();
...
}
which seems more clean to me and saves a couple of bytes for
each function.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
--- 2.6.15/kernel/spinlock.c~ 2005-09-17 18:57:30.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.15/kernel/spinlock.c 2006-01-19 19:57:42.000000000 +0300
@@ -179,16 +179,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_write_lock);
#define BUILD_LOCK_OPS(op, locktype) \
void __lockfunc _##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock) \
{ \
- preempt_disable(); \
for (;;) { \
+ preempt_disable(); \
if (likely(_raw_##op##_trylock(lock))) \
break; \
preempt_enable(); \
+ \
if (!(lock)->break_lock) \
(lock)->break_lock = 1; \
while (!op##_can_lock(lock) && (lock)->break_lock) \
cpu_relax(); \
- preempt_disable(); \
} \
(lock)->break_lock = 0; \
} \
@@ -199,19 +199,18 @@ unsigned long __lockfunc _##op##_lock_ir
{ \
unsigned long flags; \
\
- preempt_disable(); \
for (;;) { \
+ preempt_disable(); \
local_irq_save(flags); \
if (likely(_raw_##op##_trylock(lock))) \
break; \
local_irq_restore(flags); \
- \
preempt_enable(); \
+ \
if (!(lock)->break_lock) \
(lock)->break_lock = 1; \
while (!op##_can_lock(lock) && (lock)->break_lock) \
cpu_relax(); \
- preempt_disable(); \
} \
(lock)->break_lock = 0; \
return flags; \
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
