Re: My vote against eepro* removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 08:19 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
> Last time I tested (around 2.6.12), eepro100 worked much better 
> in -rt kernels w.r.t. latencies than e100:

no offence but this is EXACTLY the reason why having 2 drivers for the
same hardware is bad. People (in general) will switch to the 2nd driver
if they hit some thing that is suboptimal, rather than reporting or even
fixing it. The result of that is that you end up with 2 drivers, each
serving a portion of the users but both suboptimal in non-overlapping
ways. Having one driver that's good enough for both groups is clearly
superior to that....


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux