Re: [PATCH 1/8] Notifier chain update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:57:30PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> Sez who?  If it's not documented in the kernel source, I don't believe 
> it.

The notifier interface is supposed to be *light weight*.  Adding locks 
that get taken on every call basically changes the concept entirely.  The 
cache misses notifiers add are measurable overhead, with locks being far 
worse.

		-ben
-- 
"You know, I've seen some crystals do some pretty trippy shit, man."
Don't Email: <[email protected]>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux