Re: [PATCH 1/8] Notifier chain update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:57:30 -0500 (EST)

> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> 
> > A notifier callee should not be sleeping, if anything it should be putting 
> > its work onto a workqueue and completing it when it gets scheduled if it 
> > has to do something that blocks.
> 
> Sez who?  If it's not documented in the kernel source, I don't believe 
> it.

Many notifiers even get run from software interrupt context,
making sleeping illegal.

For example, IPV6 addresses can get added/removed from a device
in response to packets, and these operations trigger the
inet6addr_chain notifier in net/ipv6/addrconf.c

So sleeping in a notifier is indeed illegal.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux