Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1

Greg KH wrote:
>> dmesg etc looks ok. I'd appreciate it if anyone has any thoughts?
> 
> Nothing has changed in usbfs that might cause this that I know of.  Can
> you use git to bisect what patch caused it?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

And indeed nothing had changed. There was a runaway process using 100% of the
CPU causing the symptoms. After gently bashing my boot scripts around
everything seems to work just fine. So, RC1 seems 100% on my setup.

Sorry for the noise.
David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Linux 2.6.16-rc1
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1
    • From: David R <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1
• Next by Date: 2.6.16-rc1 perfmon2 new code base with Montecito support + libpfm available
• Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1
• Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]