Re: RFC [patch 00/34] PID Virtualization Overview

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 11:38 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 20:28 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 11:01 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > Other than searches, there appear to be quite a number of drivers an
> > > subsystems that like to print out pids.  I can't find any cases yet
> > > where these are integral to functionality, but I wonder what approach we
> > > should take. 
> > 
> > those should obviously print out the REAL pid, not the application
> > pid ... so no changes needed.
> 
> One suggestion was to make all pid comparisons meaningless without some
> kind of "container" context along with it.  The thought is that using
> pids is inherently racy

current->pid sure isn't racey, you yourself KNOW you're not going
away :)





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux